Ratan Tata recently acknowledged that positioning Nano
as a cheap car was a mistake. It was international branding Guru Jack
Trout , who 2 weeks back opined that positioning Nano as a cheap car was a
mistake.
Mr. Tata accepting this is a welcome step. Most
entrepreneurs won’t accept their mistake and would try to justify
their decision any how.
Larger points are ;
- Even if price is your competitive advantage, competitive on
price won’t work always and in some cases like this will spoil
the brand.
- Why to focus on price when product feature &
experience can out weight price considerations
- Irrespective of category of product or services, owners,
users should feel proud of enraging with brands. In the case of
NANO it was missing.
Even in the case of low cost airlines, differentiation should
happen on services, punctuality & feeling of
getting associated with brands.
Mostly companies forget this FEELING part. Owing NANO car means owner can’t afford costly car & using cheap car. This is a negative feeling for owners and will deter many others because of these negative feelings.
Mostly companies forget this FEELING part. Owing NANO car means owner can’t afford costly car & using cheap car. This is a negative feeling for owners and will deter many others because of these negative feelings.
Like the brand ONIDA has taught us years ago, neighbors’
ENVY, owners’ PRIDE should be
the positioning for every brand. NANO is missing on both these counts.
Focus and position on customer experience & how you make them
feel & people will find out pricing of their own.
When companies miss out on experience part or have no clue about it , they focus on price.
What is your view on positioning of affordable housing projects?
What is your view on positioning of affordable housing projects?